Translating cancer biology into therapeutic opportunities

We characterise tumours at molecular, cellular and spatial resolution, find the mechanisms and biomarkers worth acting on, follow how disease changes under treatment, and design therapeutics against what we find.

Selected research work

Tumour heterogeneity and the microenvironment

Multi-omics and spatial profiling

Case: vulnerabilities in lymphoma


Resistance to immune checkpoint blockade

Tumour, immune and stromal profiling, with organoid models

Case: modelling ICB resistance


Rare and single-patient cancers

Multi-modal profiling, variant structural modelling and a designed assay

Case: an N=1 programme


Targets with no conventional active site

De novo design against allosteric pockets at protein–protein interfaces

Featured case: a mitotic kinesin

ADCs, bispecifics and T-cell engagers

Antigen selection through to format developability

WHAT WE DO

An integrated solution for actionable therapeutic strategies

OMICS ANALYSIS

Multi-omics integration

Genomic, transcriptomic and proteomic data harmonised across studies and modalities to characterise tumour states and patient subgroups.


Spatial transcriptomics

Xenium, Visium and CosMx data analysed to map the spatial organisation of tumour, immune and stromal compartments.


Tumour immune states

Immune-landscape profiling and cell-state signatures from bulk and single-cell data, annotated against public reference atlases.


Tissue and circulating signals

Joint analysis of tumour tissue and blood-borne markers from the same patient.

LONGITUDINAL ANALYSIS

Clonal composition

Somatic and germline variant calling with clonality-aware analysis, tracking clonal expansion under treatment.


ctDNA, MRD and response

ctDNA analysis for minimal residual disease and molecular recurrence, tumour mutational burden models, and patient stratification on ctDNA profiles.


Resistance signatures

Molecular signatures associated with emerging resistance, including single-patient settings corroborated by clinical course.


Tumour–immune interaction

TCR repertoire profiling and longitudinal immune-state tracking.

NETWORK MODELLING

Network modelling

Pathway and network analysis linking molecular observations to signalling relationships and candidate targets, used for target prioritisation.


Tumour-microenvironment mechanisms

Characterisation of tumour–immune–stromal interactions and assessment of their druggability.


Drug repurposing

Systematic drug–target evidence integration against identified vulnerabilities, generating repurposing and combination candidates.


Biomarkers and endotypes

Molecular stratification of patient cohorts into subgroups, with candidate biomarkers for each.

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND TARGET PRIORITISATION

Structural analysis of variants

Protein structure prediction, structural analysis and molecular dynamics to assess the functional consequences of a variant and its effect on drug binding.


Target prioritisation

A target shortlist ordered by the strength of the evidence behind each candidate, with the dossier that supports it.

TRANSLATIONAL ASSAY DESIGN

Organoid models

Patient-derived and tumour organoids for drug efficacy, resistance mechanisms and response biomarkers.


Image analysis

Whole-slide histopathology and high-content imaging: cell-type quantification, tissue classification, tumour grading and biomarker extraction.


Functional assay design and programme management

Assay design to test a defined mechanistic hypothesis, and integration of computational and experimental workstreams.

DRUG DESIGN

Design and derisk therapeutics

What follows once there is a strategy. Available on its own, and not part of the work above.


Rational therapeutic and combination design

Generative design of small molecules, degraders and covalent binders, optimised for activity together with synthesizability and ADMET.

Design constrained by the intellectual-property landscape as well as by biology, chemistry and pharmacology.


Targeted biologics, from antigen to format

Antigen selection, binder and epitope design, format developability and conjugation chemistry.


Binding affinity by quantum chemistry

Binding-affinity prediction using quantum-chemical and DFT methods, for candidates that empirical scoring functions cannot separate.


Developability and patient selection

In silico assessment of toxicity, permeability and solubility, and biomarker-guided patient selection for trial design.

EVIDENCE

Case studies

Biopharma R&D

Therapeutic design · De novo · Mitotic kinesin

Inhibitors designed from fragments for an allosteric pocket at a protein–protein interface

The conventional active site offered no useful way in. The opening worth designing against was an allosteric pocket where two proteins meet harder to model, and the reason the programme ran computationally first.

Characterise the pocket

Structure modelling and molecular dynamics of the complex, to establish the pocket and its sub-pockets

Build a fragment library

Fragments from known actives, approved drugs and generative chemistry, filtered for drug-likeness

Link and grow inside the pocket

Fragments docked by sub-pocket, then joined with generative linkers or grown in place

Triage the hits

Docking, molecular strain, off-target and toxicity filters, then molecular dynamics on what survived

Answered: which designed molecules hold the interactions the pocket needs, and which sub-pocket each one works through.

Lung cancer · immune checkpoint blockade

Mapping and modelling resistance to immune checkpoint blockade

Why do tumours stop responding to checkpoint inhibitors, and how can that resistance be reproduced in a model you can experiment on?

Tumour, immune and stromal profiling

Spatial transcriptomics

The microenvironment in its spatial arrangement

Patient-derived organoids

Resistance carried into a functional model

Answered: which microenvironment features travel with resistance, and whether they survive into an organoid.

The patient’s tumour profiled across all three compartments, carried into an organoid, then challenged and the question the design turns on: do the same features carry over?

Lymphoma · drug repurposing

Decoding therapeutic vulnerabilities for drug repurposing in lymphoma

Which molecular and cellular features separate the tumour states that matter clinically and does any existing drug already hit them?

Bulk and single-cell transcriptomics

Tumour states resolved at cell level

Surfaceome and proteomic profiling

What is actually presented on the cell surface

Immune-state characterisation and network biology

Phenotypes connected to signalling and process

Systematic drug–target evidence

Repurposing candidates ranked against the vulnerabilities found

Answered: which disease-associated phenotypes carry therapeutic vulnerabilities, and which existing drugs address them.

Tumour states resolved cell by cell, what the cells present on their surface, the immune states and pathways that connect them, and the existing drugs that reach them.

Precision medicine

Single-patient (N=1) work
Rare, heterogeneous tumour

Uncovering therapeutic vulnerabilities in a single patient with a rare cancer

What biological mechanism can be built from one patient’s multi-modal data, when the tumour is rare and heterogeneous and there is no cohort to learn from?

Multi-modal profiling

Tumour states resolved at cell level

Tumour–immune microenvironment

How the immune compartment is organised around the tumour

Structural modelling of a candidate variant

What the variant plausibly does to the protein

A functional assay, designed

Built to test that specific mechanism experimentally

Answered: which mechanism could guide the choice of an experimental therapy for this patient, and how to test it.

From one patient’s sample: molecular layers read together, the tumour and its microenvironment resolved, and a candidate variant modelled for the assay that tests it.

The platforms behind this work

EVIDENCE

DBTIPS™

AI-enabled retrieval and harmonisation of disease and target evidence literature, multi-omics, pathways, tractability, clinical and market context in one dossier.AI-enabled retrieval and harmonisation of disease and target evidence literature, multi-omics, pathways, tractability, clinical and market context in one dossier.

OMICS

DISTILL™

AI-powered single-cell and multi-omics platform for integration, tumour and immune profiling, and spatial analysis.

AGENTS

Igniva™

Agentic AI platform combining domain-specialised agents, models and workflows to run and reason over these analyses.

SEQUENCING

NGS DataWorks™

Sequencing data analytics for oncology, functional genomics and disease studies, on private cloud or HPC.

READ MORE

From our scientists

BLOG · DEGRADERS

De novo PROTAC design with generative AI and FBDD

Choosing the target, E3 ligase and linker together, with degradability models and MD of the ternary complex.

BLOG · COVALENT

Covalent binder design with generative AI and FBDD

Cysteine-targeting design that combines structure modelling, reinforcement learning and fragments.

Talk to a Scientist about your oncology programme

Bring the problem you are stuck on. We will tell you which of our methods and data apply, and what we have done that is close to it.